Rancher relationship layer
Producer goals, contact history, permissions, trusted relationships, peer mentors and next actions.
Aridon proposes a 90-day pilot of the Rancher Network OS to help regenerative grazing teams coordinate producer relationships, peer networks, water and drought resilience, funding, agreements, field outcomes and grant reporting across regions.
TNC publicly says its North America Regenerative Grazing Lands strategy aims by 2030 to protect and improve 240 million acres of grazing lands, protect 57 million at-risk acres from conversion and avoid or sequester 7.3 million metric tons of CO₂ per year. It also says a core action is strengthening, connecting and activating local and regional rancher-led networks while helping producers access technical expertise, financial resources and technology. That is the exact workflow this pilot is designed around.
Producer goals, contact history, permissions, trusted relationships, peer mentors and next actions.
Plans, rest periods, infrastructure, field observations and program-specific outcome indicators.
Wells, tanks, troughs, shortages, drought triggers, water projects and resilience priorities.
Public grants, cost share, conservation finance, sponsor programs and capital planning.
Deliverables, match requirements, deadlines, evidence, invoices, reporting and ownership.
Aggregate learning across regions without exposing private producer data.
Permissioned sharing, data retention, Tribal data-sovereignty requirements and auditability.
Regional initiatives, Sentinel Landscapes / REPI-compatible work, habitat and compatible land-use programs.
Planning price for the defined 90-day pilot, including configuration, onboarding, staff training, cohort support, workflow refinement, dashboard and final evaluation. Travel, third-party data, field hardware or custom integrations would be separately approved before expense.
Scale decision: if the pilot earns expansion, price the multi-state enterprise program from actual usage and support requirements rather than guessing today.
Percent of participating ranchers with a current action plan and agreed next step
Median time from producer conversation to assigned action / partner handoff
Peer introductions, technical-assistance matches and completed partner connections
Eligible opportunities surfaced, applications started and awards where measurable
Deliverables on time, evidence completeness and overdue action reduction
Ranches with baseline water risks documented and prioritized resilience actions
Administrative/reporting time reduced or redirected to producer-facing work
Producer and field-staff willingness to continue using the workflow
Private ranch-level data should remain permissioned. Public or leadership reporting defaults to aggregate information unless the producer has approved attribution. Tribal participants require governance aligned with the participating Nation’s data-sovereignty requirements.
Staff turnover no longer erases relationship history. A rancher does not have to retell the entire story every time a program changes. Leaders can see where networks are thriving, where grants are slipping and where producers need help, without flattening local judgment.
The first conversation should be with Regenerative Grazing Lands strategy leadership and the rancher-network / collaborative-conservation team. If the workflow resonates, bring in grants, data/governance and one or two state or initiative-area staff to co-design the pilot.
Open the live network